Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21
  1. #1
    Senior Member..now yer posting! outlawgibbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Fox lake.
    Posts
    284

    Brand new 4.6L Ford block. Still in crate.

    i have 3 of them for sure, maybe a few more once I go thru all the crates. All are brand new and still in the crated except one I opened to take a look at.

    4.6 Aluminum Ford block only

    Part number is F60Z-6010-AB

    Im not a Ford guy so I know nothing about what it will fit or what years they are for. I figure some of you guys might know or know someone who would be interested in them

    $200 a piece






  2. #2
    Collecting parts! Waver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Over here
    Posts
    7,375
    The blocks are discontinued. They are from the 1996 Lincoln Continental.....a version of the 4.6 4v
    Quote Originally Posted by HITMAN View Post
    stew - continuing confirmation of the hypothesis that marbles aren't sharp.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptic View Post
    Jim you build... break... and rebuild cars faster than I can put one together.

  3. #3
    Senior Member..now yer posting! outlawgibbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Fox lake.
    Posts
    284
    Thanks for the insight.



  4. #4
    Post whore Lawn Pac Champion Irish's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Southside
    Posts
    1,421
    Dang it! If they were from a Mark viii, I'd be all over this! The Continental blocks are fwd specific from what I am told.

  5. #5
    Collecting parts! Waver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Over here
    Posts
    7,375
    From what I have read, the fully assembled engines were just detuned so that they could be used in a FWD app. I will check to see if you can use it in a rwd app
    Quote Originally Posted by HITMAN View Post
    stew - continuing confirmation of the hypothesis that marbles aren't sharp.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptic View Post
    Jim you build... break... and rebuild cars faster than I can put one together.

  6. #6
    You can't use it for RWD. The bolt pattern on the back of the block will not match any RWD tranny. Sucks cause I was thinking the same thing...Teksid blocks?!
    -Josh

    Tork Tech Thunderbird

    God Bless the men & women who have served and serving to keep us free

  7. #7
    Post whore Lawn Pac Champion Irish's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Southside
    Posts
    1,421
    Quote Originally Posted by OxmanWI View Post
    You can't use it for RWD. The bolt pattern on the back of the block will not match any RWD tranny. Sucks cause I was thinking the same thing...Teksid blocks?!
    I knew there was something in the casting of the block that was different. I couldn't recall what it was though. I also thought the motor mount portions were different too..

  8. #8
    Senior Member..now yer posting! outlawgibbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Fox lake.
    Posts
    284
    So I'm guessing these things are light weight boat anchors



  9. #9
    Collecting parts! Waver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Over here
    Posts
    7,375
    It could make a cool swap for a fwd car....perhaps like a Taurus or a contour or something.
    Quote Originally Posted by HITMAN View Post
    stew - continuing confirmation of the hypothesis that marbles aren't sharp.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptic View Post
    Jim you build... break... and rebuild cars faster than I can put one together.

  10. #10
    Post whore Lawn Pac Champion Irish's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Southside
    Posts
    1,421
    Quote Originally Posted by outlawgibbs View Post
    So I'm guessing these things are light weight boat anchors
    Scrap prices?

  11. #11
    Senior Member..now yer posting! outlawgibbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Fox lake.
    Posts
    284
    $100 a piece to anyone willing to mess with one



  12. #12
    Ol' School -stew-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Leaning on a city truck
    Posts
    4,559
    This is better than Storage Wars...

  13. #13
    Senior Member..now yer posting! outlawgibbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Fox lake.
    Posts
    284
    So acording to Wikipedia you guys are wrong

    The 4-valve DOHC version of the Modular engine was introduced in the 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII as the 4.6 L Four-Cam V8. Lincoln marketed the engine under the name InTech after 1995.[5]

    The 1993–1998 4-valve engines featured cylinder heads with two intake ports per cylinder (split-port) and variable runner length intake manifolds with either vacuum or electrically activated intake manifold runner controls (IMRC) depending on application. The engine was revised for 1999 with new cylinder heads featuring tumble-style intake ports (one intake port feeding two intake valves), new camshaft profiles, and fixed runner-length intake manifolds. These changes resulted in more power, torque and a broader power-band when compared to the earlier 4-valve engines.

    All 4.6 L 4-valve engines featured aluminum engine blocks with 6-bolt main bearing caps, the only exception being the 2003–2004 SVT Cobra which had a 4-bolt main cast iron block. The 1999 and earlier engines featured an aluminum block cast in Italy by Fiat subsidiary Teksid S.p.A. Since 1996, all of the 4.6 L 4-valve engines manufactured for use in the SVT Cobra have been hand-built by SVT technicians at Ford's Romeo, Michigan plant.[6]

    The 4-valve DOHC 4.6 L engine was on the Ward's 10 Best Engines list for 1996 and 1997.

    Vehicles equipped with the 32-valve DOHC 4.6 L include the following:
    1993–1998 Lincoln Mark VIII, 280 hp (209 kW) and 285 lb·ft (386 N·m)
    1995–1998 Lincoln Continental, 260 hp (194 kW) and 265 lb·ft (359 N·m)
    1996–1998 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra, 305 hp (227 kW) and 300 lb·ft (407 N·m)
    1997–1999 Panoz AIV Roadster, 305 hp (227 kW) and 300 lb-ft (407 N-m)
    1995–1998 Lincoln Mark VIII LSC, 290 hp (216 kW) and 295 lb·ft (400 N·m)
    1997–1999 Marcos Mantis GT, 320 hp (239 kW) and 317 lb·ft (430 N·m)
    1999–2002 Lincoln Continental, 275 hp (205 kW) and 275 lb·ft (373 N·m)
    1999/2001 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra, 320 hp (239 kW) and 317 lb·ft (430 N·m)
    2000–2001 Qvale Mangusta, 320 hp (239 kW) and 317 lb·ft (430 N·m)
    2003–2005 MG X-Power SV, 320 hp (239 kW) and 317 lb·ft (430 N·m)
    2000–2008 Panoz Esperante, 320 hp (239 kW) and 320 lb·ft (434 N·m) [7]
    2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1, 305 hp (227 kW) and 320 lb·ft (434 N·m)
    2004 Ford Mustang Mach 1, 310 hp (231 kW) and 335 lb·ft (454 N·m) [8]
    2003–2004 Mercury Marauder, 302 hp (225 kW) and 318 lb·ft (431 N·m)
    2003–2005 Lincoln Aviator, 302 hp (225 kW) and 318 lb·ft (431 N·m)
    2003–2004 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra, Iron block, Supercharged, 390 hp (291 kW) and 390 lb·ft (529 N·m)


    Also

    Power now came from the Modular 32v DOHC 4.6 V8 also used in the Lincoln Mark VIII, but slightly de-tuned for front wheel drive use.



  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by outlawgibbs View Post
    So acording to Wikipedia you guys are wrong

    The 4-valve DOHC version of the Modular engine was introduced in the 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII as the 4.6 L Four-Cam V8. Lincoln marketed the engine under the name InTech after 1995.[5]

    The 1993–1998 4-valve engines featured cylinder heads with two intake ports per cylinder (split-port) and variable runner length intake manifolds with either vacuum or electrically activated intake manifold runner controls (IMRC) depending on application. The engine was revised for 1999 with new cylinder heads featuring tumble-style intake ports (one intake port feeding two intake valves), new camshaft profiles, and fixed runner-length intake manifolds. These changes resulted in more power, torque and a broader power-band when compared to the earlier 4-valve engines.

    All 4.6 L 4-valve engines featured aluminum engine blocks with 6-bolt main bearing caps, the only exception being the 2003–2004 SVT Cobra which had a 4-bolt main cast iron block. The 1999 and earlier engines featured an aluminum block cast in Italy by Fiat subsidiary Teksid S.p.A. Since 1996, all of the 4.6 L 4-valve engines manufactured for use in the SVT Cobra have been hand-built by SVT technicians at Ford's Romeo, Michigan plant.[6]

    The 4-valve DOHC 4.6 L engine was on the Ward's 10 Best Engines list for 1996 and 1997.

    Vehicles equipped with the 32-valve DOHC 4.6 L include the following:
    1993–1998 Lincoln Mark VIII, 280 hp (209 kW) and 285 lb·ft (386 N·m)
    1995–1998 Lincoln Continental, 260 hp (194 kW) and 265 lb·ft (359 N·m)
    1996–1998 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra, 305 hp (227 kW) and 300 lb·ft (407 N·m)
    1997–1999 Panoz AIV Roadster, 305 hp (227 kW) and 300 lb-ft (407 N-m)
    1995–1998 Lincoln Mark VIII LSC, 290 hp (216 kW) and 295 lb·ft (400 N·m)
    1997–1999 Marcos Mantis GT, 320 hp (239 kW) and 317 lb·ft (430 N·m)
    1999–2002 Lincoln Continental, 275 hp (205 kW) and 275 lb·ft (373 N·m)
    1999/2001 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra, 320 hp (239 kW) and 317 lb·ft (430 N·m)
    2000–2001 Qvale Mangusta, 320 hp (239 kW) and 317 lb·ft (430 N·m)
    2003–2005 MG X-Power SV, 320 hp (239 kW) and 317 lb·ft (430 N·m)
    2000–2008 Panoz Esperante, 320 hp (239 kW) and 320 lb·ft (434 N·m) [7]
    2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1, 305 hp (227 kW) and 320 lb·ft (434 N·m)
    2004 Ford Mustang Mach 1, 310 hp (231 kW) and 335 lb·ft (454 N·m) [8]
    2003–2004 Mercury Marauder, 302 hp (225 kW) and 318 lb·ft (431 N·m)
    2003–2005 Lincoln Aviator, 302 hp (225 kW) and 318 lb·ft (431 N·m)
    2003–2004 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra, Iron block, Supercharged, 390 hp (291 kW) and 390 lb·ft (529 N·m)


    Also

    Power now came from the Modular 32v DOHC 4.6 V8 also used in the Lincoln Mark VIII, but slightly de-tuned for front wheel drive use.
    "Another version of the aluminum block that you may come across is the front wheel drive (FWD)
    block. This block is modified for use in the FWD Lincoln Continental. Changes include a different
    coolant flow, additional bosses for engine mounts, and a unique bellhousing bolt pattern. The FWD
    bellhousing bolt pattern renders this block useless for rear wheel drive applications, as no
    rear-drive transmission bolts up."

    http://www.mre-books.com/sa82/sa82_1.html

  15. #15
    Pissing in your Cheerios HITMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    United Socialist States of America
    Posts
    3,144
    Post pics of the block, specifically the back where the bell-housing bolts up. That should answer any questions as to the nature of these blocks for those looking to use them in a RWD application.

  16. #16
    Senior Member..now yer posting! outlawgibbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Fox lake.
    Posts
    284
    Quote Originally Posted by HITMAN View Post
    Post pics of the block, specifically the back where the bell-housing bolts up. That should answer any questions as to the nature of these blocks for those looking to use them in a RWD application.
    Ill rip one out of the crate after Christmas when I have a chance to

    Thanks for all your help guys



  17. #17
    Collecting parts! Waver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Over here
    Posts
    7,375
    Quote Originally Posted by HITMAN View Post
    Post pics of the block, specifically the back where the bell-housing bolts up. That should answer any questions as to the nature of these blocks for those looking to use them in a RWD application.
    I ran the part number here at work.....
    Quote Originally Posted by HITMAN View Post
    stew - continuing confirmation of the hypothesis that marbles aren't sharp.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptic View Post
    Jim you build... break... and rebuild cars faster than I can put one together.

  18. #18
    Post whore Lawn Pac Champion Irish's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Southside
    Posts
    1,421
    I'll tell you this. If they are a Rwd block, I will be first in line to buy one!

  19. #19
    Senior Member..now yer posting! outlawgibbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Fox lake.
    Posts
    284
    For the record I've been told I may have a hand full of 302 blocks as well but I haven't dug deep enough to get the part number



  20. #20
    Dusting off my knick knack... MurphysLaw88GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Under a bridge
    Posts
    2,510
    let me know if you have a new roller 302 block

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •